🟡Newsletter - July 2025
Montly Newsletter
Reproducibility and Open Science
Disclaimer The views expressed here are my own in my professional capacity as a Data Steward and Research Data Manager. They do not necessarily represent the official positions of the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Medicine – reNEW.
Introduction
At the core of credible science lies a simple principle: results must be reproducible. If a study cannot be repeated with the same outcomes, its findings remain uncertain, no matter how promising they appear.
Reproducibility is not only a technical standard but the foundation of trust between researchers and the public. In recent years, the Open Science movement has emerged as a powerful driver of reproducibility, promoting transparency, collaboration, and accessibility across the research landscape.
Key Challenges in Reproducibility
1. Erosion of Trust
A significant number of published studies cannot be replicated, raising concerns about the reliability of the scientific record.
2. Wasted Resources
Pursuing irreproducible research consumes time, funding, and effort that could be directed toward more reliable work.
3. High-Stakes Consequences
In fields like medicine and public health, irreproducible results can have direct impacts on patient care and policy decisions.
Best Practices and Solutions: Open Science in Action
Open Access
Removes paywalls, broadening the reach of published research.
Expands peer review opportunities beyond traditional reviewers.
Facilitates early detection of errors through wider scrutiny.
Open Data
Makes raw data available for verification, re-analysis, and reuse.
Supports meta-analyses and cross-study comparisons.
Strengthens the robustness and generalizability of conclusions.
Open Methodology
Shares detailed protocols and workflows to enable replication.
Promotes standardization, reducing variability between studies.
Encourages feedback that improves experimental design.
Open Source
Publishes code and algorithms for community inspection and improvement.
Reduces the risk of hidden errors in proprietary tools.
Enables reproducible and transparent computational analysis.
Local Context: reNEW and UCPH
At reNEW Copenhagen and the University of Copenhagen, adopting Open Science principles can significantly enhance reproducibility across research domains. This means:
Making datasets and metadata available in UCPH-approved repositories.
Documenting and sharing methods and protocols in accessible formats.
Using open-source analytical tools to enable verifiable results.
Encouraging cross-group and interdisciplinary collaboration to validate findings.
Practical Recommendations
Publish in Open Access Journals – Maximize reach and transparency.
Deposit Data in Trusted Repositories – Ensure accessibility and FAIR compliance.
Share Detailed Protocols – Use platforms like protocols.io to make methods reusable.
Use and Contribute to Open-Source Tools – Promote transparency in computational workflows.
Embed Openness in Project Planning – Address reproducibility in DMPs from the outset.
Looking Ahead
Reproducibility and Open Science are not optional extras but pillars of high-quality, credible research. By committing to openness, we strengthen trust in science, foster collaboration, and build a more transparent and equitable global research ecosystem.
Last updated